State place rankings
Best Places in Montana
Compare places by General Quality score or population. Each place links to its sourced facts, scores, and local summary.
General Quality score
Best overall places
- st
Bozeman, MT
City
- General Quality
- Population
- 58,814
- Median home value
- $687,900
- nd
King Arthur Park, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 1,992
- Median home value
- Not available
- rd
Helena, MT
City
- General Quality
- Population
- 35,138
- Median home value
- $387,300
- th
Four Corners, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 5,791
- Median home value
- $648,400
- th
Missoula, MT
City
- General Quality
- Population
- 78,903
- Median home value
- $473,100
- th
Bridger, MT (CDP)
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 73
- Median home value
- Not available
- th
Bonner-West Riverside, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 1,563
- Median home value
- $210,900
- th
Helena West Side, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 1,417
- Median home value
- $402,300
- th
Sedan, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 182
- Median home value
- Not available
- th
Churchill, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 1,167
- Median home value
- $690,600
- th
Helena Valley West Central, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 8,056
- Median home value
- $367,200
- th
Pine Creek, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 132
- Median home value
- $838,200
- th
Kalispell, MT
City
- General Quality
- Population
- 31,851
- Median home value
- $428,000
- th
Gallatin Gateway, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 933
- Median home value
- $814,400
- th
Belgrade, MT
City
- General Quality
- Population
- 13,107
- Median home value
- $535,200
- th
Orchard Homes, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 5,588
- Median home value
- $553,700
- th
Helena Valley Northeast, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 4,659
- Median home value
- $576,700
- th
Piltzville, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 383
- Median home value
- $477,600
- th
Whitefish, MT
City
- General Quality
- Population
- 9,358
- Median home value
- $684,300
- th
East Missoula, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 2,099
- Median home value
- $358,500
- st
Springhill, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 187
- Median home value
- Not available
- nd
Big Sky, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 2,445
- Median home value
- $1,137,900
- rd
Amsterdam, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 130
- Median home value
- $480,000
- th
Lolo, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 4,314
- Median home value
- $431,800
- th
Turah, MT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 543
- Median home value
- $470,400
How this list is ranked
Places are ordered by General Quality score. General Quality is a balanced livability composite spanning safety, affordability, healthcare, climate, education, jobs, mobility, outdoors, taxes, and other core factors.
Largest to smallest
Population-ranked places
- st
Billings, MT
City
- Population
- 121,239
- Median home value
- $343,400
- Median rent
- $1,138
- nd
Missoula, MT
City
- Population
- 78,903
- Median home value
- $473,100
- Median rent
- $1,189
- rd
Great Falls, MT
City
- Population
- 60,208
- Median home value
- $257,000
- Median rent
- $900
- th
Bozeman, MT
City
- Population
- 58,814
- Median home value
- $687,900
- Median rent
- $1,717
- th
Butte-Silver Bow, MT
Published place
- Population
- 35,469
- Median home value
- $257,800
- Median rent
- $856
- th
Helena, MT
City
- Population
- 35,138
- Median home value
- $387,300
- Median rent
- $1,092
- th
Kalispell, MT
City
- Population
- 31,851
- Median home value
- $428,000
- Median rent
- $1,078
- th
Belgrade, MT
City
- Population
- 13,107
- Median home value
- $535,200
- Median rent
- $1,877
- th
Anaconda-Deer Lodge, MT
County
- Population
- 9,709
- Median home value
- $231,700
- Median rent
- $696
- th
Evergreen, MT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 9,611
- Median home value
- $340,800
- Median rent
- $1,166
- th
Whitefish, MT
City
- Population
- 9,358
- Median home value
- $684,300
- Median rent
- $1,354
- th
Livingston, MT
City
- Population
- 9,290
- Median home value
- $392,400
- Median rent
- $1,046
- th
Havre, MT
City
- Population
- 9,264
- Median home value
- $211,700
- Median rent
- $844
- th
Helena Valley Southeast, MT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 9,108
- Median home value
- $331,500
- Median rent
- $1,106
- th
Miles City, MT
City
- Population
- 8,450
- Median home value
- $200,200
- Median rent
- $926
- th
Helena Valley West Central, MT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 8,056
- Median home value
- $367,200
- Median rent
- $1,327
- th
Laurel, MT
City
- Population
- 7,205
- Median home value
- $235,100
- Median rent
- $974
- th
Lockwood, MT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 7,181
- Median home value
- $235,400
- Median rent
- $1,138
- th
Sidney, MT
City
- Population
- 6,217
- Median home value
- $236,900
- Median rent
- $931
- th
Lewistown, MT
City
- Population
- 6,179
- Median home value
- $198,400
- Median rent
- $1,007
- st
Four Corners, MT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 5,791
- Median home value
- $648,400
- Median rent
- $1,338
- nd
- Population
- 5,753
- Median home value
- $384,400
- Median rent
- $1,016
- rd
Polson, MT
City
- Population
- 5,653
- Median home value
- $356,300
- Median rent
- $912
- th
Orchard Homes, MT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 5,588
- Median home value
- $553,700
- Median rent
- $1,000
- th
Bigfork, MT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 5,565
- Median home value
- $674,600
- Median rent
- $1,016
How this list is ranked
Places are ordered by their latest available population estimate. Incorporated places and census-designated places are both eligible when they appear in the published location data.
Annual Census population estimates are used where available; ACS place estimates fill coverage gaps.