State place rankings
Best Places in Connecticut
Compare places by General Quality score or population. Each place links to its sourced facts, scores, and local summary.
General Quality score
Best overall places
- st
Wethersfield, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 27,250
- Median home value
- $324,600
- nd
Greenwich, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 14,792
- Median home value
- $1,515,700
- rd
Weston, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 966
- Median home value
- $1,110,500
- th
Greens Farms, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 3,229
- Median home value
- $1,314,700
- th
Orange, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 14,315
- Median home value
- $491,500
- th
Old Hill, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 2,990
- Median home value
- $1,479,400
- th
West Hartford, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 63,620
- Median home value
- $411,000
- th
Riverside, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 8,954
- Median home value
- $1,900,300
- th
Old Greenwich, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 6,936
- Median home value
- $1,844,700
- th
Tokeneke, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 2,951
- Median home value
- $2,000,001
- th
North Haven, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 24,336
- Median home value
- $393,200
- th
Portland, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 5,944
- Median home value
- $282,300
- th
Milford, CT
City
- General Quality
- Population
- 51,215
- Median home value
- $415,200
- th
Noroton, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 5,539
- Median home value
- $1,620,000
- th
Daniels Farm, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 5,976
- Median home value
- $619,900
- th
Ridgefield, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 6,970
- Median home value
- $843,600
- th
Noroton Heights, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 2,782
- Median home value
- $1,225,400
- th
Newtown, CT
Borough
- General Quality
- Population
- 1,980
- Median home value
- $523,200
- th
Plattsville, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 910
- Median home value
- $671,300
- th
Glastonbury Center, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 7,266
- Median home value
- $373,300
- st
New Canaan, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 6,896
- Median home value
- $1,099,400
- nd
Newington, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 30,896
- Median home value
- $310,400
- rd
Compo, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 3,410
- Median home value
- $1,522,500
- th
Coleytown, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 3,472
- Median home value
- $1,589,700
- th
Indian Field, CT
Census-designated place
- General Quality
- Population
- 716
- Median home value
- $2,000,001
How this list is ranked
Places are ordered by General Quality score. General Quality is a balanced livability composite spanning safety, affordability, healthcare, climate, education, jobs, mobility, outdoors, taxes, and other core factors.
Largest to smallest
Population-ranked places
- st
Bridgeport, CT
City
- Population
- 152,273
- Median home value
- $274,900
- Median rent
- $1,450
- nd
Stamford, CT
City
- Population
- 139,535
- Median home value
- $624,400
- Median rent
- $2,276
- rd
New Haven, CT
City
- Population
- 138,774
- Median home value
- $287,100
- Median rent
- $1,488
- th
Hartford, CT
City
- Population
- 121,981
- Median home value
- $228,600
- Median rent
- $1,269
- th
Waterbury, CT
City
- Population
- 115,771
- Median home value
- $208,500
- Median rent
- $1,225
- th
Norwalk, CT
City
- Population
- 94,508
- Median home value
- $558,000
- Median rent
- $2,073
- th
Danbury, CT
City
- Population
- 89,033
- Median home value
- $411,200
- Median rent
- $1,846
- th
New Britain, CT
City
- Population
- 76,286
- Median home value
- $223,600
- Median rent
- $1,253
- th
West Hartford, CT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 63,620
- Median home value
- $411,000
- Median rent
- $1,756
- th
Bristol, CT
City
- Population
- 62,341
- Median home value
- $277,800
- Median rent
- $1,338
- th
Meriden, CT
City
- Population
- 60,810
- Median home value
- $241,200
- Median rent
- $1,294
- th
West Haven, CT
City
- Population
- 55,351
- Median home value
- $291,700
- Median rent
- $1,442
- th
Milford, CT
City
- Population
- 51,215
- Median home value
- $415,200
- Median rent
- $1,882
- th
East Hartford, CT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 50,918
- Median home value
- $229,700
- Median rent
- $1,225
- th
Middletown, CT
City
- Population
- 48,439
- Median home value
- $295,300
- Median rent
- $1,446
- th
Shelton, CT
City
- Population
- 42,880
- Median home value
- $452,600
- Median rent
- $1,741
- th
Norwich, CT
City
- Population
- 40,001
- Median home value
- $242,300
- Median rent
- $1,253
- th
Manchester, CT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 36,759
- Median home value
- $223,400
- Median rent
- $1,384
- th
Torrington, CT
City
- Population
- 35,796
- Median home value
- $215,500
- Median rent
- $1,169
- th
Naugatuck, CT
Borough
- Population
- 32,230
- Median home value
- $259,100
- Median rent
- $1,369
- st
Newington, CT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 30,896
- Median home value
- $310,400
- Median rent
- $1,524
- nd
New London, CT
City
- Population
- 28,003
- Median home value
- $253,300
- Median rent
- $1,340
- rd
East Haven, CT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 27,806
- Median home value
- $294,200
- Median rent
- $1,528
- th
Wethersfield, CT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 27,250
- Median home value
- $324,600
- Median rent
- $1,370
- th
North Haven, CT
Census-designated place
- Population
- 24,336
- Median home value
- $393,200
- Median rent
- $1,720
How this list is ranked
Places are ordered by their latest available population estimate. Incorporated places and census-designated places are both eligible when they appear in the published location data.
Annual Census population estimates are used where available; ACS place estimates fill coverage gaps.